Case Study 3
Defroster Nozzle
Activity: Injection Molding Project Title: Results of 2 Door panels and 1 Bin Assembly & 1 Defroster nozzle Company: XXXXXX State Indiana Consultants: Michael Zalipski Date: August 2001 – December 2001 Client Contact: XXXX Summary: Evidence of success – Consulting and Training – improving Injection MoldingProcess on Chrysler door panels.
Mold 300C Reduced scrap from 15% to 3% $114,345.64 Reduced part weight 148 grams Reduced cycle time 7 seconds Improved part quality by running on Cavity Pressure Control Implemented (APC) Automated Part Containment Reallocated 1 operator per shift – 3 shifts
Mold 307C Reduced scrap from 8% to 1% $145,994.40 Reduced part weight 250 grams Reduced cycle time 6 seconds Improved part quality by running on Cavity Pressure Control Implemented (APC) Automated Part Containment Reallocated 1 operator per shift – 3 shifts
Mold 3530 Reduced scrap from 10% to 5% $212,544.43 Reduced part weight 28.6 grams Reduced cycle time 8.9 seconds Improved part quality by running on Cavity Pressure Control Implemented (APC) Automated Part Containment
Overall Cost Savings for 3 tools: $472,884.43
Total Savings for the 4 Jobs $719,531.50